Local registry provides support for storing the protobuf representation of your feature store objects (data sources, feature views, feature services, etc.) in local file system. It is only intended to be used for experimentation with Feast and should not be used in production.
There are inherent limitations with a file-based registries, since changing a single field in the registry requires re-writing the whole registry file. With multiple concurrent writers, this presents a risk of data loss, or bottlenecks writes to the registry since all changes have to be serialized (e.g. when running materialization for multiple feature views or time ranges concurrently).
An example of how to configure this would be:
S3 registry provides support for storing the protobuf representation of your feature store objects (data sources, feature views, feature services, etc.) in S3 file system.
While it can be used in production, there are still inherent limitations with a file-based registries, since changing a single field in the registry requires re-writing the whole registry file. With multiple concurrent writers, this presents a risk of data loss, or bottlenecks writes to the registry since all changes have to be serialized (e.g. when running materialization for multiple feature views or time ranges concurrently).
An example of how to configure this would be:
The Snowflake registry provides support for storing the protobuf representation of your feature store objects (data sources, feature views, feature services, etc.) Because Snowflake is an ACID compliant database, this allows for changes to individual objects atomically.
An example of how to configure this would be:
The full set of configuration options is available in SnowflakeRegistryConfig.
GCS registry provides support for storing the protobuf representation of your feature store objects (data sources, feature views, feature services, etc.) uing Google Cloud Storage.
While it can be used in production, there are still inherent limitations with a file-based registries, since changing a single field in the registry requires re-writing the whole registry file. With multiple concurrent writers, this presents a risk of data loss, or bottlenecks writes to the registry since all changes have to be serialized (e.g. when running materialization for multiple feature views or time ranges concurrently).
An example of how to configure this would be:
By default, the registry Feast uses a file-based registry implementation, which stores the protobuf representation of the registry as a serialized file. This registry file can be stored in a local file system, or in cloud storage (in, say, S3 or GCS).
However, there's inherent limitations with a file-based registry, since changing a single field in the registry requires re-writing the whole registry file. With multiple concurrent writers, this presents a risk of data loss, or bottlenecks writes to the registry since all changes have to be serialized (e.g. when running materialization for multiple feature views or time ranges concurrently).
An alternative to the file-based registry is the SQLRegistry which ships with Feast. This implementation stores the registry in a relational database, and allows for changes to individual objects atomically. Under the hood, the SQL Registry implementation uses SQLAlchemy to abstract over the different databases. Consequently, any database supported by SQLAlchemy can be used by the SQL Registry. The following databases are supported and tested out of the box:
PostgreSQL
MySQL
Sqlite
Feast can use the SQL Registry via a config change in the feature_store.yaml file. An example of how to configure this would be:
Specifically, the registry_type needs to be set to sql in the registry config block. On doing so, the path should refer to the Database URL for the database to be used, as expected by SQLAlchemy. No other additional commands are currently needed to configure this registry.
Should you choose to use a database technology that is compatible with one of Feast's supported registry backends, but which speaks a different dialect (e.g. cockroachdb
, which is compatible with postgres
) then some further intervention may be required on your part.
SQLAlchemy
, used by the registry, may not be able to detect your database version without first updating your DSN scheme to the appropriate DBAPI/dialect combination. When this happens, your database is likely using what is referred to as an external dialect in SQLAlchemy
terminology. See your database's documentation for examples on how to set its scheme in the Database URL.
Psycopg
, which is the database library leveraged by the online and offline stores, is not impacted by the need to speak a particular dialect, and so the following only applies to the registry.
If you are not running Feast in a container, to accomodate SQLAlchemy
's need to speak an external dialect, install additional Python modules like we do as follows using cockroachdb
for example:
If you are running Feast in a container, you will need to create a custom image like we do as follows, again using cockroachdb
as an example:
If you are running Feast in Kubernetes, set the image.repository
and imagePullSecrets
Helm values accordingly to utilize your custom image.
There are some things to note about how the SQL registry works:
Once instantiated, the Registry ensures the tables needed to store data exist, and creates them if they do not.
Upon tearing down the feast project, the registry ensures that the tables are dropped from the database.
The schema for how data is laid out in tables can be found . It is intentionally simple, storing the serialized protobuf versions of each Feast object keyed by its name.
The SQL Registry should be used when materializing feature views concurrently to ensure correctness of data in the registry. This can be achieved by simply running feast materialize or feature_store.materialize multiple times using a correctly configured feature_store.yaml. This will make each materialization process talk to the registry database concurrently, and ensure the metadata updates are serialized.
Please see Registry for a conceptual explanation of registries.